🔗 Share this article

The federal appeals court has upheld a prohibition on sending state troops in the Oregon city, following a recent court ruling.

Appeals Court Concurs to Rehear Case

The federal appeals court decided on this week that it would rehear the legal dispute concerning the president’s authority with an expanded group of 11 judges. The court also vacated a previous ruling from a smaller judicial group that had sided with the administration.

Ongoing Dispute Over Military Presence

This legal directive represents the latest turn in a protracted legal battle over whether the former president has the authority and valid reason to send national guard forces in the city. Approximately two hundred troops have been in limbo since the end of September when the deployment effort was initiated in due to ongoing demonstrations.

Differing Viewpoints

The administration has claimed that government employees at the ICE facility in south Portland were under attack, while city and state officials maintain that local officers have command of the situation.

Contrary to characterizations of the city as a conflict zone, residents have been sharing footage of scenic paths and a vibrant culinary culture, and planning activities such as an Emergency Naked Bike Ride against the “militarization of our city”.

Recent Legal Actions

The Tuesday ruling came after a US district judge in Portland enacted two temporary restraining orders this period – one preventing the federal control of the state troops, and another stopping the deployment of any military personnel in Oregon, after attempts to circumvent the initial injunction by mobilizing out-of-state forces.

On the previous day, the ninth circuit panel had put the first ruling on hold – allowing command of 200 Oregon national guard – but the second ruling stayed effective, preventing the physical sending of the troops.

Full Panel Consideration

The latest ruling means the matter will be heard “en banc” – with all decisions under review simultaneously – by a panel of 11 judges.

“This decision demonstrates that the truth matters and that the courts are working to ensure government responsibility. The constitution restricts the president’s power, and local populations cannot be treated as a training ground for expansive government power,” said the state attorney general in a statement.

“The court is sending a definite signal: the president cannot dispatch the armed forces into US cities unnecessarily. We will continue defending Oregon’s laws, values, and sovereignty as this legal proceeding moves forward and our fight continues in the judicial system.”