🔗 Share this article

Loved ones whose relatives buried in resting places vulnerable to shoreline retreat say that indecision over how to address the problem is causing them unnecessary distress about the eternal homes of their departed family.

A Looming Threat to Historic Graveyards

The council have identified three burial grounds in the communities of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being in danger of being engulfed by the ocean in the next few generations.

A recent report on the situation details a range of options, from taking no action to disinterring bodies and relocating them in more secure locations. Authorities maintain it is for local people to decide how to move forward.

“At the moment we’re in limbo. It causes me distress. My parents wanted this to serve as their final resting place, but it won't be because of the encroaching sea.”

Estimates indicate at least part of one graveyard could be claimed by the waves in the next 80 years, but some residents fear it will happen far earlier. “In my view it’s got less than 20 years, if you look at what’s happened in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Haunted by the Ghosts of Eccles

A local business owner remembered a school trip to the nearby settlement of Eccles, which has largely vanished into the sea, along with its place of worship and burial ground.

“You could see people’s bones,” she said. “Some have this idealized notion that the deceased will just get washed out to the ocean. They won’t. Individuals will take bones as mementos and go plundering graves in search of treasures. That is completely disrespectful.”

“I’m worried that the identical fate that happened at Eccles will occur here and there’ll be bones on the shore. I’d be disgusted by that.”

A Soldier's Grave in Jeopardy

Further up the coast is situated the grave of a ex-soldier who died while serving overseas. His mother said she lost sleep after learning her child's grave might one day be moved.

“It does disturb me to think this may not remain his lasting resting place,” she said. “To our family it’s an significant place to go.”

She believes, new burials should cease but says it is too soon to exhume existing graves. “What I would choose for now is to do nothing and watch carefully, but an early decision must be made when a critical moment has been reached.”

Searching for Answers and Certainty

The lack of consensus over when and how to tackle the challenge has left bereaved families feeling frustrated and worried.

Some want more sea defences to delay the unavoidable loss and to allow funerals to proceed for now. Others argue the moment for moving graves is drawing near.

“The situation is very emotional,” a family member stated. “The council’s report was really good, but now there’s confusion about how it is implemented. And everybody is avoiding responsibility over who is responsible.”

A coastal manager said the graveyards were owned and managed of the church authorities. “Ultimately it is up to them to choose the direction to take. We are here to help support them through that journey with communities.”

He added there was time to consider all the choices. “This concerns decades before it begins getting lost.”

“Currently, there exists no unified opinion on what should happen yet. It requires productive community discussions to find the appropriate solutions for each community.”

The possibility of losing the churches and graveyards was described as one of “immense sadness for the local community,” but church representatives also spoke of a doctrine in resurrection, offering a spiritual viewpoint on the temporal disappearance of sacred ground.